Indian Pacing Electrophysiol. J.


   ISSN  0972-6292

Home Page Current Issue List of Editors

Indian Pacing Electrophysiol. J. 2003;3(3):178-183

Point of View


Download PDF 225 KB  

Do All Children with Congenital Complete Atrioventricular Block Require Permanent Pacing ?

Christian Balmer MD and Urs Bauersfeld MD

Division of Cardiology University Children's Hospital Zurich, Switzerland


Address for correspondence: Dr. Christian Balmer, University Children's Hospital, Steinwiestrasse 75, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
E-mail: christian.balmer@kispi.unizh.ch


Keywords: heart block, congenital; pacemaker, artificial; lupus erythematosus


          
 With an incidence of 1 in 20,000 live born infants1, congenital complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB) is a rare disease. The aetiology is not completely understood. However, CCAVB may be isolated or combined with congenital heart diseases in up to 53% of affected individuals2. Isolated CCAVB is in up to 98% of the children associated with positive autoimmune antibodies in the maternal serum (anti-Ro/SS-A and anti-LA/SS-B)3,4. Interestingly, these antibodies are not specifically directed against the conduction system but also against normal myocardial cells and may cause myocarditis5,6. Affection of the conduction system can occur at different levels7. Histologically, the atrioventricular node tissue may be replaced by fibrous fatty tissue with variable involvement of the distal conduction system8.
            The onset of clinical symptoms in patients with CCAVB is already antenatally in up to 28%9, but can also occur only later in life. This is due to a variable degree of heart block and heart rate. Most of the symptoms are related to the slow heart rate: hydrops foetalis, heart failure of the neonate, exercise intolerance of the child. Longer pauses may cause praesyncope, syncope (classical Adams Stokes attacks) or even sudden cardiac death. Whether or not Cardiomegaly is mainly the result of a chronic compensatory increased stroke volume secondary to the slow heart rate is somewhat controversial10. Cardiomegaly may also be a distinct disease in a subgroup of patients because it does not necessarily resolve with pacemaker (PM) therapy11,12. Morbidity and mortality of CCAVB do not seem to correlate with antibody status or associated cardiac lesions13,14. There are case reports, that fetal CCAVB can be improved with steroids15. Rarely, CCAVB resolves spontaneously16,17,18,19. In most patients, the degree of conduction abnormality will either persist or worsen over time.

            There is no causal therapy for CCAVB. Permanent pacing is the only possible therapy. The aim of PM therapy is to prevent sudden cardiac death and to restore an adequate heart rate to avoid any secondary effects of longstanding bradycardia.
            In our clinical practice, the ACC/AHA/NASPE guidelines for PM implantation proved to be useful20. Although one has to keep in mind that because of the rareness of the disease and the lack of large randomized trials, the level of evidence is usually low and most of these recommendations are based on experts opinions only.
            The following patients with CCAVB should undergo permanent pacing (Fig 1): First, all patients with advanced second- or third- degree AV block with symptomatic bradycardia, exercise intolerance or low cardiac output. In children, symptoms can be subtle. In young children there may be poor growth and development, sleep disturbances including night - terror and bed wetting, frequent naps compared to peers and preference for a more sedentary behavior. School children may show poor school performance secondary to tiredness, the need to nap or to go to bed very early after school, irritability, and inability to keep up with peers during exercise 13. Patients and parents tend to accept and adapt to minor symptoms and recognize them only in retrospect. Often, restored normal heart rates and the chronotropic competence after PM implantation lead to an exciting and motivating gain in energy and perseverance, which can change the personality of the child from lazy and lethargic to energetic and quick.

Fig 1: Management of Patients with congenital compete heart block. For details see text.


            Second, patients with ECG changes believed to be associated with an increased risk for life threatening arrhythmias such as an unstable escape rhythm, sinus tachycardia, wide QRS escape rhythm, prolonged QT interval or ventricular arrhythmia20. The level of evidence is best for the latter two19,21. Long RR pauses are acceptable up to 3 seconds while awake or 5 seconds while sleeping13. Ambulatory ECG monitoring with frequent episodes of junctional exit block, flat junctional response or associated tachyarrhythmias have been noted in patients with adverse outcomes22 but are not generally accepted as risk factors for sudden death.
            Third, patients with cardiomegaly11,12,23 or ventricular dysfunction20. In some patients, cardiomegaly is part of a dilated cardiomyopathy which can still progress in spite of PM therapy11,12. In most patients a decrease in left ventricular size and an improved myocardial function has been demonstrated after PM implantation23.
            The lower limits of an acceptable escape rhythm might be around 55 bpm in neonates and 50 bpm in patients older than one year with the patient being awake and at rest20. In a prospective study of 27 patients with CCAVB and a mean age of 6.8 years 8 of 13 patients with mean daytime rates below 50 bpm in ambulatory ECG monitoring had cardiac complications such as sudden cardiac death (n=3), syncope, praesyncope or excessive fatigue22.
            The indication for a PM implantation is also given in patients with CCAVB and significant congenital heart diseases (i.e. those with cyanotic heart disease, single ventricle physiology, complete AVSD or significant AV valve disease)13. Again, this recommendation is not strictly evidence based but in these children, the haemodynamic status is often jeopardized from many reasons and restoring a normal heart rate and AV synchrony is often followed by a general improvement and well being.

            Unfortunately, a large number of patients with CCAVB do not fall in the categories mentioned above and need an individual assessment. In most of these asymptomatic patients without specific changes in ECG or echocardiography we would still follow a permanent pacing strategy. We have to balance carefully the risks and disadvantages of a PM implantation against the risk of sudden cardiac death. The acceptance of a permanent PM by patients as well as parents is usually extremely good. There are however some specific age and size related particularities.
            We try to achieve a haemodynamic situation as close as possible to the normal heart rhythm. Therefore we tend to implant dual chamber PM in most of the children. The miniaturizing of pulse generators nowadays allows for implanting dual chamber pacing systems in babies down to 1600g 24. In infants and small children we do have very good experiences with bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial pacing leads, attached to the right atrium and right ventricle by a median sternotomy (Fig 2) or fixed to the left atrium and left ventricle after a lateral thoracotomy. Since all of the children will need their PM for a lifetime, we push the age limit for transvenous pacing system towards preschool age in order to avoid intimal trauma and obstruction of large veins in order to preserve them for later PM - systems. It is necessary to leave enough length to the leads to allow for growth of the patient. We prefer devices with automatic threshold measurement and output adjustment (AutoCapture) to increase patient safety and to extend device service life since most of the patients will be paced continuously at relatively high rates25. Although some children are still asymptomatic during childhood most of the patients with CCAVB will have PM therapy when reaching adulthood19.

           

Fig 2: Dual chamber pacemaker with epicardial electrodes implanted through a median sternotomy in a newborn with complete heart block.

            Patients with CCAVB without PM do need a close, at least yearly, follow-up with 12 lead ECG, 24 hour Holter monitoring and echocardiography. Despite the absence of symptoms in childhood, 50% of the patients will develop symptoms in adulthood and 10% will die prematurely17,18,19. With regards to the ECG it is important to know that not only the AV conduction can worsen over time but also prolonged QTc interval can appear the first time in adulthood in patients who previously had normal QTc17,19.
            Patients with CCAVB may present with similar symptoms but in fact it is a mixed group of diseases with a variety of yet not clearly defined aetiologies. Therefore it is very difficult to predict the natural history. There is a lack of evidence with regards to risk factors predicting sudden cardiac death or syncope in patients with CCAVB. With newer PM technologies the indications for PM therapy in children have been extended over the last years so that patients without symptoms and without specific signs in ECG or echocardiography may also benefit from the advantages of a permanent PM.


References

1. Michaelsson M, Allen Engle M. Congenital complete heart block: an international study of the natural history. Cardiovasc Clinics 1972;4:85-101.

2.  Schmidt KG, Ulmer HE, Silverman NH, Kleinman CS, Copel JA. Perinatal outcome of fetal complete atrioventricular block: A multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;91:1360-6.

3. Smeenk RJ. Immunological aspects of congenital atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997;20:2093-7.

4.  Watson RM, Lane AT, Barnett NK, Bias WB, Arnett FC, Provost TT. Neonatal lupus erythematosus. A clinical, serological and immunogenetic study with review of the literature. Medicine 1984;63:362-8.

5.  Taylor PV, Scott JS, Gerlis LM, Esscher E, Scott O. Maternal antibodies against fetal cardiac antigens in congenital complete heart block. N Engl J Med 1986;315:667-72.

6. Litsey SE, Noonan JA, O'Connor WN, Cottrill CM, Mitchell B. Maternal connective tissue disease and congenital heart block. Demonstration of immunoglobulin in cardiac tissue. N Engl J Med 1985;312:98-100.

7. Lev M. Pathogenesis of congenital atrioventricular block. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1972;25:145-157.

8. Chow LT, Cook AC, Ho SY, Leung MP, Anderson RH. Isolated congenitally complet heart block attributable to combined nodoventricular and intraventricular discontinuity. Hum Pathol 1998;29:729-36.

9.  Jaeggi ET, Hamilton RM, Silverman ED, Zamora SA, Homberger LK. Outcome of children with fetal, neonatal or childhood diagnosis of isolated congenital atrioventricular block. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:130-7.

10.  Kertesz NJ, Friedman RA, Colan SD, Walsh EP, Gajarski RJ, Gray PS. Left ventricular mechanics and geometry in patients with congenital complete atrioventricular block. Circulation 1997;97:3430-35.

11.  Moak JP, Barron KS, Hougen TJ, Wiles HB, Balaji S, Sreeram N et al. Congenital heart block: development of late-onset cardiomyopathy, a previously underappreciated sequel. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:238-42.

12.  Udink ten Cate FEA, Breur JMP, Cohen MI, Boramanand N, Kapusta L, Crosson JE et al. Dilated Cardiomyopathy in isolated congenital complete atrioventricular block: early and long-term risk in children. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1129-34.

13.  Friedman RA, Fenrich AL, Kertesz NJ. Congenital complete atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001;24:1681-8

14.  Balmer C, Fasnacht M, Rahn M, Molinari L, Bauersfeld U. Long-term follow-up of children with congenital complete atrioventricular block and the impact of pacemaker therapy. Europace 2002;4:345-9.

15. Copel JA, Buyon JP, Kleinman CS. Successful in utero therapy of fetal heart block. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 1995;173:1384-90.

16.  Tsuji A, Yanai J, Komay T, Sato M, Asaishi T, Fukuda T. Recovery from congenital complete atrioventricular block. Pediatr Cardiol 1988;9:163-6.

17. Esscher EB. Congenital complete heart block in adolescence and adult life. A follow up study. Eur Heart J 1981;2:281-8.

18. Campbell M, Emanuel R. Six cases of congenital complete heart block followed for 34-40 years. Brit Heart J 1967;29:577-87.

19. Michaelsson M, Jonzon A, Riesenfeld T. Isolated complete atrioventricular block in adult life, a prospective study. Circulation 1995;92:442-9.

20. Gregoratos, G, Abrahams J, Epstein AE, Friedman RA, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA et al. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices - summary article. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1703-19.

21. Esscher E, Michaelsson M. QT interval in congenital complete heart block. Pediatr Cardiol 1983;4:121-4.

22.  Dewey RC, Capeless MA, Levy AM. Use of ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring to identify high-risk patients with congenital complete heart block. N Engl J Med 1987;316:835-9.

23. Breur JMPJ, Udink ten Kate FEA, Kapusta L, Cohen MI, Crosson JE, Boramanand N et al. Pacemaker therapy in isolated congenital complete atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:1685-1691.

24. Villain E, Martelli H, Bonnet D, Iserin L, Butera G, Kachaner J. Characteristics and results of epicardial pacing in neonates and infants. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:2052-2056.

25. Bauersfeld U, Nowak B, Molinari L, Malm T, Kampmann C, Schonbeck MH, Schuller H. Low energy epicardial pacing in children: the benefit of autocapture. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1380-3.
 

Home Page Current Issue List of Editors